Harry Crouch

If you feel superior, applaud, laugh, or cheer at the end of your read please don’t breed

February 3rd, 2010
By Harry Crouch
Article Source
Posted in Harry Crouch

The following is the introduction in a two page presentation folder cover, front and back. The folder contains brochures and articles and was used as a handout at the 2008 International Violence, Abuse, and Trauma conference in San Diego. NCFM-SD produced 500 of the folders and handed out most of them at the conference. I came across what few copies are left in a file drawer. It occurred to me that you and others might like to read it. Then it occurred to me that some could print it out and actually use it as a two page handout, especially if you are an NCFM member! It starts off…

“You should feel uncomfortable when reading this. While some would have us believe that making one feel “uncomfortable” is criminal, others believe in free speech, the exchange of ideas, and that the questioning of opposing views inherently involves becoming uncomfortable. You have the right to read or not read. No one is forcing you to read this. If you choose to read further and feel conflicted because of closely held beliefs, then you may wittingly or unwittingly be contributing to the politically correct disenfranchisement and premature death of males, one or more of whom you may love, perhaps even your son. If your beliefs are rigid and immune from critical thinking perhaps you should stop reading: or, for that matter perhaps you already have. If you feel superior, applaud, laugh, or cheer at the end of your read please don’t breed. What follows is only a beginning…

In the original version the prisoner in ball and chain was more visible. I lightened him up so the text was easier to read.

Harry Crouch

Bookmark and Share

NCFM PRESS RELEASE: National Coalition for Men: President Obama Speech Spreads More Myths About Gender Pay Gap

January 29th, 2010
By Harry Crouch
Article Source
Posted in Harry Crouch, Wage Gap Myth, discrimination against men

National Coalition for Men: President Obama Speech Spreads More Myths About Gender Pay Gap

Obama Ignores Department of Labor Study that Proves the Gender Pay Gap A Woman’s Option

For Immediate Release

LOS ANGELES/EWORLDWIRE/Jan. 29, 2010 — National Coalition for Men (NCFM) Spokesman Marc Angelucci affirms that during President Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address on Wednesday evening, the President ignored “overwhelming evidence showing the pay gap is the result of choices made by men and women, including how many hours they work, the type of work, flexibility, commute distances, physical risk, and other factors.”

In his presentation, President Obama said: “We’re going to crack down on violations of equal pay laws - so that women get equal pay for an equal day’s work.” In stating this, says Angelucci, “President Obama helped spread the myth that the gender pay gap is due to sex discrimination.

Angelucci points to the Department of Labor (DOL) which recently funded a major study on on the causes of the pay gap. The results showed what earlier studies also found - the pay gap reflects women’s privilege of having more options than men - to stay home full-time, or to work part-time or full-time. (’http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%‘).

The DOL result was further supported in the book, Why Men Earn More,” by Warren Farrell, Ph.D. Farrell examined 25 career/life choices men and women make - hours and commute times, among others - that lead to men earning more and women having more balanced lives. Data showed how men in surveys prioritize money while women prioritize flexibility, shorter hours, shorter commutes, and other factors conducive to being primary parents - an option still mostly denied to men. The book proposes that is why never-married childless women generally outearn their male counterparts.

As Farrell explained, there are many careers, including science fields, where women outearn men. Today, female U.S. corporate directors outearn men. (’http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0752118220071107?feed...‘).

Women between ages 21 and 30 working full-time earned 117% of men’s wages. (’http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/03/nyregion/03women.html?_r=1&oref=slog…‘).

“Women simply have more options than men to be primary parents, and many of them exercise that option rather than work long, stressful hours,” reported Angelucci. “That is why 57 percent of female graduates of Stanford and Harvard left the workforce within 15 years of entry into the workforce.” (’http://edition.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/03/15/optout.revolution/‘).

“This is an option few men have. Try being a single male and telling women on the first date that you want to stay home instead of going to work.”

“Worse,” said Angelucci, “Obama ignores gender disparities impacting men in virtually all aspects of our society including homelessness, work-related deaths and injuries, excessive work hours, unemployment, child custody, criminal sentencing, mortality rates, mental illness, suicide deaths, dropouts, delinquency, education, military deaths, and more.

NCFM calls on Obama to be truthful about the gender pay gap consistent with his March 2009 memo insisting on scientific integrity, and also calls on Obama to stop ignoring issues affecting men and boys. “Our elected officials should help all of us, not just women,” said Angelucci. “There are still many of us who love our sons as well as our daughters.”

More mainstream articles refuting the pay gap:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/business/global/29iht-riedgenper.htm…
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-05-04-equal-parenting_N.htm
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/GiveMeABreak/story?id=797045&page=1&CMP=OTC…
http://money.cnn.com/2007/06/04/magazines/fortune/muphy_payact.fortune...

HTML: http://www.eworldwire.com/pressreleases/211463
PDF: http://www.eworldwire.com/pdf/211463.pdf
MOBILE: http://e4mobile.com/view_release.php?id=211463
ONLINE NEWSROOM: http://www.eworldwire.com/newsroom/312078.htm
NEWSROOM RSS FEED: http://newsroom.eworldwire.com/xml/newsrooms/312078.xml
LOGO: http://www.eworldwire.com/newsroom/312078.htm

CONTACT:
Marc Angelucci
National Coalition for Men
1964 Addison Way
Los Angeles, CA 90041
PHONE. 626-319-3081

Harry Crouch, President


National Coalition for Men: President Obama Speech Spreads More Myths About Gender Pay Gap

Obama Ignores Department of Labor Study that Proves the Gender Pay Gap A Woman’s Option

For Immediate Release

LOS ANGELES/EWORLDWIRE/Jan. 29, 2010 — National Coalition for Men (NCFM) Spokesman Marc Angelucci affirms that during President Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address on Wednesday evening, the President ignored “overwhelming evidence showing the pay gap is the result of choices made by men and women, including how many hours they work, the type of work, flexibility, commute distances, physical risk, and other factors.”

In his presentation, President Obama said: “We’re going to crack down on violations of equal pay laws - so that women get equal pay for an equal day’s work.” In stating this, says Angelucci, “President Obama helped spread the myth that the gender pay gap is due to sex discrimination.

Angelucci points to the Department of Labor (DOL) which recently funded a major study on on the causes of the pay gap. The results showed what earlier studies also found - the pay gap reflects women’s privilege of having more options than men - to stay home full-time, or to work part-time or full-time. (’http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%‘).

The DOL result was further supported in the book, Why Men Earn More,” by Warren Farrell, Ph.D. Farrell examined 25 career/life choices men and women make - hours and commute times, among others - that lead to men earning more and women having more balanced lives. Data showed how men in surveys prioritize money while women prioritize flexibility, shorter hours, shorter commutes, and other factors conducive to being primary parents - an option still mostly denied to men. The book proposes that is why never-married childless women generally outearn their male counterparts.

As Farrell explained, there are many careers, including science fields, where women outearn men. Today, female U.S. corporate directors outearn men. (’http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSN0752118220071107?feed...‘).

Women between ages 21 and 30 working full-time earned 117% of men’s wages. (’http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/03/nyregion/03women.html?_r=1&oref=slog…‘).

“Women simply have more options than men to be primary parents, and many of them exercise that option rather than work long, stressful hours,” reported Angelucci. “That is why 57 percent of female graduates of Stanford and Harvard left the workforce within 15 years of entry into the workforce.” (’http://edition.cnn.com/2005/BUSINESS/03/15/optout.revolution/‘).

“This is an option few men have. Try being a single male and telling women on the first date that you want to stay home instead of going to work.”

“Worse,” said Angelucci, “Obama ignores gender disparities impacting men in virtually all aspects of our society including homelessness, work-related deaths and injuries, excessive work hours, unemployment, child custody, criminal sentencing, mortality rates, mental illness, suicide deaths, dropouts, delinquency, education, military deaths, and more.

NCFM calls on Obama to be truthful about the gender pay gap consistent with his March 2009 memo insisting on scientific integrity, and also calls on Obama to stop ignoring issues affecting men and boys. “Our elected officials should help all of us, not just women,” said Angelucci. “There are still many of us who love our sons as well as our daughters.”

More mainstream articles refuting the pay gap:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/business/global/29iht-riedgenper.htm…
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-05-04-equal-parenting_N.htm
http://abcnews.go.com/2020/GiveMeABreak/story?id=797045&page=1&CMP=OTC…
http://money.cnn.com/2007/06/04/magazines/fortune/muphy_payact.fortune...

HTML: http://www.eworldwire.com/pressreleases/211463
PDF: http://www.eworldwire.com/pdf/211463.pdf
MOBILE: http://e4mobile.com/view_release.php?id=211463
ONLINE NEWSROOM: http://www.eworldwire.com/newsroom/312078.htm
NEWSROOM RSS FEED: http://newsroom.eworldwire.com/xml/newsrooms/312078.xml
LOGO: http://www.eworldwire.com/newsroom/312078.htm

CONTACT:
Marc Angelucci
National Coalition for Men
1964 Addison Way
Los Angeles, CA 90041
PHONE. 626-319-3081

Harry Crouch, President

< -->< -->< -->

Bookmark and Share

I’m Just an Old Dude Trying to feel the Vibe

December 15th, 2009
By Harry Crouch
Article Source
Posted in Harry Crouch, Stuff, Uncategorized, discrimination against men

As an invited group co-facilitator I attended the San Diego African American Male Intergenerational Conference in June of 2009. My memory seems worse with age but shaking it conjures up images of me being the only white male in attendance. Reception was mixed with generally welcoming and open arms countered with occasional vibes of suspicion if not disdain. Suspicion surrounded me at lunch though older men with whom I sat soon recounted parts of their lives seemingly millions of miles from any reality known to me. One man long retired from the Army early in his career worked the fields during the Second World War and recalled ill treatment, steamy weather, bad food, long hours and stifling hot housing. Across the way were housed German prisoners of war who were pampered, not required to work, lounged in the shade day to day, had three squares of decent food , and around the clock air-conditioned housing. Many at the conference like that retired soldier touched my heart including the vibes from one old Dude, Ernie McCray, who read aloud his poignant poem below. Mr. McCray is a retired educator, author, and human rights activist. He gave me permission to publish his “Old Dude” poem and I uploaded it into this blog shortly thereafter. Since then I have posted a number of things but not the poem. Each time I come here to post something there it sat with its title patiently waiting as if challenging me to hit the post button. I really have no idea why its taken me this long to post it, I wonder about that each time I come here and see “I’m Just an Old Dude Trying to feel the Vibe” above the “Title” box in WordPress reminding then challenging me to post the poem. Every so often I re read it then tuck it away again like its somehow a part of me; and, so it has become. No matter, agreeable proddings somewhere within say it is time to share. I hope it becomes a part of you too…

I’m Just an Old Dude Trying to feel the Vibe

by

Ernie McCray

One day,

throwing

a bunch of stuff away,

I started

flipping pages

in an old

copy of VIBE,

a magazine

to which

I used to subscribe.

And that’s a fact

I would never try to hide

cuz:

I’m just

an old dude

trying to

feel the vibe.

On the cover

there sits Lil Wayne

looking like he

ain’t feeling no pain

and there’s a little of

urrrrbody in Hip Hop inside.

Young millionaires

on incredible rides:

Wyclef Jean

hugging his baby;

Eminem

doing his Shady;

Queen Latifah posing

in her natural hue;

“Flavor! Flav!” clowning

as only he can do;

Piddy selling fragrances

wearing a Sean John face;

like the baddest flyest dude

in the whole human race.

Images flashing like crazy

like rap lines spit out by Jay-Z.

Fingers signing every which a way.

eyes droopy and hazy.

Common looking serious

as a heart attack.

Chris Brown doing Michael Jackson

like there ain’t nothing to that.

Jermaine Dupri claiming he “Ain’t gettin’ no respect”

like Rodney Dangerfield.

Somebody’s looking

for the “real” Lauryn Hill.

There’s Ayo, Gorilla Zoe,

and Kilo: “Elbows up , side to side” - leaning like a cholo.

Chamillionaire hyping

Chamilitary Radio.

A word or two about Mario

and a letter or two about Obama,

who had been on the cover

a couple of months befo’,

barely passed the get go

in taking on

the status quo.

And there was T-I and T-Pain and

a whole bunch of other T’s,

it seemed to me,

followed by the DEY the Fugees

and the Black Eyed Peas.

And I kind of semi-read just about

every word written inside,

again cuz:

I’m just

an old dude

trying to

feel the vibe.

But it was dizzying trying to

keep up with all the images in that VIBE.

I mean my emotions

commenced to swirling and rushing

and stirring inside me

like crashing waves at high tide,

like

G-forces

on a

roller coaster ride.

I mean, .

as I pondered

all I had

shuffled through,

I wondered if I saw a

a single soul without a tattoo;

if I saw a smile

or a sunny mood

or any mood

without a gangsta attitude.

Looked like urrrrrbody

had put some

snarling enhancement drugs

in they food!

And, with all

I had just viewed,

there came some

quasi-scary feelings

that couldn’t be subdued:

feelings that can’t be denied;

feelings born from

knowing it’s a Hip-Hop World

in which I reside,

and knowing that the Hip-Hop Beat

resonates

World Wide.

I mean, hey, people

be wearing they long T’s

and they mile-wide trousers

down below they knees

World Wide.

Caps be on backwards

World Wide.

Dudes and Shortys calling

each other Niggaz

in just about every tongue in existence

World Wide.

Blinding bling?

Grilled teeth?

Fingers splayed

melodramatically?

World Wide.

Saying:

“You unnerstan’ what ah’m sayin?”

over and over again?

World Wide.

Grabbing the crotch

like it

stole something?

World Wide.

Lawd! Lawd!

Somebody help me understand

before I become

tongue tied.

Somebody give me some hope

before I take my last ride.

Cuz:

I’m just

an old dude

trying to

feel the vibe.

And here’s

a little aside.

One of the letters

about Obama

inside that month’s VIBE

issued this cry:

“It’sTimeToTurnThePage!”

And, hey, that writer ain’t never lied.

And if the change Obama,

who now lives in that big White House

in Washington D.C.,

has prophysized

is ever to truly be realized,

then the Hip-Hop World,

based on some of the sad tales

of hood life

I’ve read about in VIBE

might need to try a

few new thoughts on for size.

Yeah, that just might be wise,

considering so many of our

young folks are carrying AK’s

and taking other young folk’s lives;

considering that there

are a few too many

baby daddies

seeking pleasure

just for pleasure’s sake

all day and all night

and baby mamas

dropping little ones

sometimes out of spite,

sometimes even knowing the dude

ain’t ever gonna act right;

considering that too many of our children be shucking and jiving about how “getting good grades is trying to act white”; Lawd knows that ain’t right; considering that everytime we look up some superjock in the NBA and the NFL, heroes our children hail, are being hauled off to the local jail, packing heat - sweating so much courvoisier doing the rub a dub dub with all the hotties at the club that they can’t pass the DUI inspection on their own two feet; considering that way more than a fair share of our kids have been shipped off to Afghanistan and Iraq, returning home seething and desperately needing some kind of debriefing, not too mention those who come back not breathing -

Oh, it just might be wise,

with all these

factors in our lives,

for our singers

and our rappers to make rhymes

that inspire our children’s lives;

rhymes about

how they might enrich their lives

beyond their wildest dreams

and come upon better days

if they learned to view the world

in more positive

life affirming ways;

rhymes about

how beauty

is sometimes as close

as a sunset

or a sunrise;

less rhymes

about “playas”

and the glorification of

drugs being used and abused

and more rhymes

about the freedom fighters

of yesterday

who paid the heaviest of dues

so we wouldn’t have to

walk in their shoes;

less rhymes

about our troubles and woes

and our booty shaking

bitches and ho’s,

and more lines

about all the mothers

and grannies

and nieces and sisters

and aunties

who are out here everyday

contributing mightily

to their families

and to the uplifting of our communities.

Hey:

I’m just

an old dude

trying to

feel the vibe,

knowing that

the children

are trying to feel it too

deep down inside

and that makes me wish

upon a star

that our wordsmiths

whomever they are,

seen by our children

as gods

way up high -

I just wish they

would give it the old college try,

when they show up on

RHN

or VH1,

or MTV

or BET,

to do something

that’s truly fly:

Sing the children

love songs;

Sing them to them ever so softly;

Sing them to them ever so tenderly;

Sing them to them ever so sincerely;

and soulfully

and frequently

and so lyrically

that they can’t help but dream dreams

with their eyes opened wide,

dreams that enable them to realize

that they can rise above

the troubles in their lives

and not only survive

but thrive.

Oh, they could grow

to mesmerize

the world,

today’s little

boys and girls.

That’s the vibe

I’m trying to feel,

the vibe that has eluded me

for a lifetime,

the vibe that

has to resonate

if there’s ever to be

the good times.

And there could be no better time

than these times

to create a world

that has both

reason and rhyme.

Because the Planet Earth,

when we look around,

is running out of time.

But if the Hip-Hoppers,

with their words and beats

in four/four time,

help the children view their minds

as something truly divine,

rich resources

to be mined

for answers

to all the dreams

of love

and peace

that have been

deferred or denied

to humankind

throughout time -

well, if we start on this venture,

in this very moment,

we might just be

in the nick of time.

And, as for me,

I’ve written these words

in a spirit of hope

but I haven’t lost touch

with reality.

My emotions still

swirl and rush

and stir inside me

like crashing waves at high tide,

like

G-forces

ona

roller coaster ride.

I won’t live to see

what I yearn to see

but, you see,

I’ll appreciate

whatever progress

unfolds before me

down to the puniest degree.

Hmmm,

I guess

I’m now

just

an old dude

trying to

feel the vibe,

no matter

how intense it is

or how great its size.

Just let me

feel a vibe

with any amount of upside

that could make

the world

feel good inside.

That would

be some kind of vibe.

I’m just

an old dude

trying to

feel the vibe.

____________________

Harry Crouch

California Men’s Centers

National  Coalition For Men

932 C Street, Suite B

San Diego, CA 92101

619-231-1909

Join NCFM on facebook http://facebook.ncfm.org - and pass it around so others can join too!

Dedicated to men, their families, children, and the women that love them.

 

California Men’s Center is primarily funded by donations from individuals and by the National Coalition for Men (NCFM). There is no paid staff. All donations help. Your donation can made by Internet by clicking on this DONATE.  NCFM-SD is a tax exempt 501(c)3 organization - or go to http://tinyurl.com/559zjt (you may have to cut and paste that into your browser)

 

Call us for help with your child custody dispute. We provide Family Court Services mediation prepartion too. Need a paternity test or information about paternity fraud? Go to PaternityFraudDNA.com. Read the story to understand the full impact of paternity fraud.

Bookmark and Share

Stuff 12/4/09

December 4th, 2009
By Harry Crouch
Article Source
Posted in Harry Crouch, Stuff

Tiger, Tiger, Tiger, Tiger… Arrrrrgh, give my poor email box a break! But first…Deadbeat Moms On The Rise
http://www.foxcharlotte.com/dpp/news/deadbeat_moms_120209
FOX Charlotte
CHARLOTTE, NC - Meet the deadbeat moms of Mecklenburg County: Kai Waunn mccartey owes nearly $15000 in child support. Catherine Oquendo owes more than… and when the press showcases deadbeat women the laws will rapidly change, since no male legislator can stand the high pitched squeals of borderline personality disordered feminists who feel they need special privaleges to maintain their independence, autonomy, and self-sufficiency.

Tiger pleads for privacy as rumor mill gathers pace
http://www.metro.us/us/article/2009/11/30/07/2658-82/index.xml Lots of Tiger articles…this one recommends which golf club to use when beating your man…otherwise its like the other gazillion Tiger abused maybe stories out there. And then came this from Ms. Huffington….

“Bust Your Windows”: The Ballad Of Tiger & Elin (VIDEO)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/01/bust-your-windows-the-bal_n_375537.html
Huffington Post - New York,NY,USA
Now mind you I’m no “men’s rights advocate.” I’m decidedly feminist but true feminism shouldn’t advocate domestic violence of any sort…and this song …

Tiger Woods, Gender & Domestic Violence
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/03/tiger_woods_gender__domestic_violence_99392.html Cathy Young again argues for common sense…may be the best article out there re the Tiger incident…

Betrayal Trauma: How Men Are Affected by Abusive Women | MND: Your …
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2009/11/30/betrayal-trauma-how-men-are-affected-by-abusive-women/
By Dr. Tara J. Palmatier
Over 20years ago I attended Fathers’ rights group meetings for about 10 years. It seems that men have no choice but to folow Dr. Stephen Baskerville’s advice “Don’t marry, Don’t have children”. As has been posted by so many…

The Rights Of Man : HULL UNIVERSITY STUDENT’S UNION ABOLISHED …
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yhdfo9j
By About This Weblog
Earlier this week my research let me down as I had said that Hull University Student’s Union had a Men’s Officer. Unfortunately, it was abolished in June as set out in the minutes (Minute 259b) The minutes speak volumes about…

Gun ruling reversal tests domestic violence law
http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/76792412.html
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Skoien, 30, was convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence in 2006 and sentenced to probation. In 2007, probation agents learned Skoien had gotten a gun …

The DNA Dad Dilemma
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/science/The-DNA-Dad-Dilemma-/articleshow/5279284.cms
Times of India
The revelation from a DNA test was devastating and prompted him to leave his wife - but he had not renounced their child. He continued to feel that in all …

In the UK, Paternity Fraud is Criminal, but Never Prosecuted
http://mensnewsdaily.com/glennsacks/2009/11/27/in-the-u-k-paternity-fraud-is-criminal-but-never-prosecuted/
Men’s News Daily - Guerneville,CA,USA
The writer, Janet Street-Porter, takes on the issue of paternity fraud by telling us that a defrauded man’s response is all “about virility. …

The Jobless Gender Gap
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704576204574531453974382142.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Wall Street Journal
As the feminist movement taught us, what happens to one gender happens to us all. Mr. Kuhn is chief political correspondent at realclearpolitics.com. …

Honduras: Feminist Leader Detained in Tegucigalpa
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0911/S00317.htm
Scoop.co.nz
Merlin is being held not because she was in possession of a can of spraypaint, but because she is a leader of the feminist movement. …

Adams Law for Men Sets Precedent
http://www.wethemen.us/news/media/829-adams-law-for-men-sets-precedent.html
Men’s Rights attorney in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida… if you are in the area and need such services you might want to check this guy out, Gerald Adams and Associates.

Feminists Psychoanalyze Themselves Update November 2009
http://preview.tinyurl.com/y8jotzp
Right Side News
Women’s Studies courses require students to accept as an article of faith the silly notion that gender differences are not natural or biological but are …

‘Hoarders’ digging up drama, helping compulsive pack rats
http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2009-11-30-hoarders30_CV_N.htm
USA Today
Until someone steps in - child protective services, outsiders - they don’t know there are issues.” While Deborah and other hoarders are embarrassed or …

Advocating for Girls’ Sports With a Sharp Tongue
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/30/sports/30advocate.html?_r=1
New York Times
“Since the vast majority of schools are out of compliance with Title IX, realistically none of us are going to sue every one of them,” she said. …

MENS Society becomes official Union society
http://www.student-direct.co.uk/2009/11/mens-society-becomes-official-union-society/
Student Direct
Critics of the group have claimed that the very existence of the MENS society would be harmful to the work of women’s groups who campaign for equal rights

Savage Love Letter of the Day
http://www.student-direct.co.uk/2009/11/mens-society-becomes-official-union-society/
The Portland Mercury

A false accusation of sexual violation-innocently false or maliciously false-can be a kind of sexual violation, VAG, particularly when the false accusation

We need a new women’s health movement
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-ehrenreich2-2009dec02,0,5052221.story
Los Angeles Times
In the post-feminist United States, issues such as rape, domestic violence and unwanted pregnancy seem to be too edgy for much public discussion… sure, just like we need three 17 fingers.

Bomb Squad Detonates Device At SCC Agency
http://www.ksbw.com/news/21790826/detail.html
KSBW
Child Protective Services of Santa Cruz County had to call in the bomb squad on Wednesday after a homemade explosive device was brought into their offices. …

Ex-Wife Admits Starting Fire at Kuwait Wedding That Killed 43 Women, Children
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,539909,00.html …still, she blamed it on a man…she was angry at her Ex… thanks to Ron H. for this one.

Is feminism really killing the family?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/03/is-feminism-destroying-the-family
guardian.co.uk

Is feminism “destroying the family”? Plenty of people appear to believe so. Earlier this week, “crop-haired” Katherine Rake, who recently ended a seven-year …

Harry Crouch
California Men’s Centers
National Coalition For Men
932 C Street, Suite B
San Diego, CA 92101
619-231-1909

Join NCFM on facebook http://facebook.ncfm.org - and pass it around so others can join too!

Dedicated to men, their families, children, and the women that love them

Bookmark and Share

Recommendations for California’s Elkin’s Family Law Task Force

December 4th, 2009
By Harry Crouch
Article Source
Posted in Harry Crouch, family court

Recommendations for California’s Elkin’s Family Law Task Force

Harry Crouch

www.ncfm.org

www.californiamenscenters.org

Bookmark and Share

Reasons Why Women Make False Accusations

November 17th, 2009
By Harry Crouch
Article Source
Posted in Domestic abuse/violence, False Accusation, Harry Crouch, Paternity fraud, Restraining orders, Sexual Assault/Rape, discrimination against men, family court

“False accusations are not a rarity, they are themselves a form of rape, and a political hot potato. It will doubtless take a female politician of enormous integrity to confront the issue.” Warren Farrell, Myth of Male Power. The Myth of Male Power is a must read for anyone interested in issues related to false accusations.

REASONS WOMEN MAKE VARIOUS FALSE SEXUAL ALLEGATIONS INSTITUTE for PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES (IPT Journal), Frank S. Zepezauer, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1994.
If anyone has information as complete and credible as this since 1994 please send it to me.

We are also looking for a copy of Charles P. McDowell, Ph.D. “False Allegations” which was published in Forensic Science Digest, (publication of the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations), Vol. 11, No. 4 (December 1985), p. 64. If you have a copy please send it my way.

As an aside, if you are interested in learning how to protect yourself or someone else from false accusations, particularly false rape accusations, you might read Sex, Lies, and Rape, How to Recognize False Allegations of Rape.

Take Care,
Harry Crouch
President National Coalition For Men

Bookmark and Share

Tadros v Doyne Amicus Brief - Corruption in San Diego Family Court

November 16th, 2009
By Harry Crouch
Article Source
Posted in Harry Crouch, family court

The National Coalition For Men joined in this amicus brief, Tadros v Doyne amicus brief. You can read our letter in Appendix B.

Attorney Cole Stuart put together this excellent brief in less time than it takes to bail out of jail for a false domestic violence charge. As of this typing attorney Stuart is still requesting more individuals and organizations sign on as supporters.

If interested you will find near the back of the brief blank signature pages. Just print one out, fill in the requested information, and fax to Cole Stuart at 424.228.5272. More contact information is in the brief if you want to scan and email a copy to Cole or otherwise contact him for additional information. The brief has been filed but additional supporters will be submitted to the Court supplement-ally.

You can Google “Tadros” and “Doyne” (both words in quotes with the and in the middle for even more background).

Take Care,

Harry Crouch

President, National Coalition For Men

Bookmark and Share

NCFM flyer distributed personally to 435 House of Representatives Offices

November 6th, 2009
By Harry Crouch
Article Source
Posted in Domestic abuse/violence, Harry Crouch

On Friday, November 5, 2009, Amidst the raging healthcare reform debate, four men arrived on Capitol Hill, armed with little more than the truth and a flyer from the National Coalition For Men. The flyer was distributed to all 435 Representatives’ offices. The flyer concerns House Resolution 817 which is riddled with false information, is gender biased against men, and reinforces wrongful gender based stereotypes. The visits and flyer puts the VAWA crowd on notice: you need to start telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, which they are apparently incapable of doing! Thank you RADAR and out NCFM members therein… we’re everywhere.

Bookmark and Share

Do PC feminists really think women are too weak…..or just too special?

November 5th, 2009
By Harry Crouch
Article Source
Posted in Darrin Albert, Harry Crouch

This is a must read article. It’s one of the best I’ve seen on male disposibility and female pampering - Harry Crouch.

Do PC feminists really think women are too weak…..or just too special?

by Darrin Albert (Member, National Coalition For Men (NCFM)/MS Psychology)

I was having lunch with a friend one time, a nice enough guy, and I asked him if it was fair that most of the blue-collar grunt-laborers seemed to be males wherever you looked. I don’t know if this resonated poorly with any feminist sympathies of his or not, but he told me something to the effect that “Well, men are bigger and stronger and logically are more cut out for that sort of thing”. I didn’t want to keep badgering him about this issue, but I really wanted to ask him a followup question: If males are so “big and tough” and well-suited for this kind of dirty grunt-work, why do men comprise the vast majority of work-related fatalities? I mean, just because men are “better” suited this does not mean that they ARE suited for a certain line of work. This all got me thinking further, and I believe there are three note-worthy societal platitudes that many PC feminists exploit to their advantage to maintain or increase womens place of privilege. These platitudes are “winner takes all”, “if you give an inch they will take a mile”, and “ladies first”.

Winner takes all:

Okay, so let us assume that dangerous work and war are for “big boys” only. To the untrained eye this might seem reasonable. However, there is a caveat when it comes to the issue of physical strength. Hypothetically speaking, let’s assume that an average female soldier has a 25% chance of dying in a war and an average male has a 15% chance of dying (these are arbitrary numbers to illustrate a point, and such numbers could also be generated for “risk of death” in a hazardous job setting). At first glance this disparity appears to be unfair to women, and it essentially is. But here is where society starts to exhibit a cognitive bias. Let’s assume that there is a scale or balance represented by “man’s likelihood of dying” on the left side and “woman’s likelihood of dying” on the right side. Notice how the “likelihood of dying” reflects a continuous variable whereas the human states of “life” and “death” are mutually exclusive (since a person can only be alive or dead, which is also sometimes called the Law of Excluded Middle). Next, we notice how society tends to place the 15% chip on the left side of the balance (male’s likelihood of dying) and the 25% chip on the right side of the balance (female’s likelihood of dying). Naturally, the right and female side of the scale tips downward since there is a greater weight of 10% (25-15). This is where society tends to take a “winner take all” approach and does massive rounding of numbers. Just because there is a slightly greater chance of female death, society extrapolates this to justify keeping women out of war almost altogether (by using the societal forces of the male-only draft and covert socialization of males to “take it like a man” by being disposable heroes, protectors, and breadwinners). By keeping women out of war almost altogether, however, the male likelihood of death either stays the same (15%) or even increases while the female chance of death goes from 25% to 0% (since the women who would have fought are now exempt). So what was hypothetically unfair for women before (10% higher chance of death) is now extremely unfair for men (15% higher chance of death). The variable and continuous concepts of “more” or “less” don’t mean the same thing as mutually exclusive concepts like “either” or “or”. They should not be confused with each other. To put things in more simple terms, how is it fair to men that their general increase in stamina and physical prowess translates into male disposability? The bottom line is that regardless of strength, males are dying in tragic numbers. Are women really too weak….or just too special? Are men really strong….or just disposable?

If you give an inch they will take a mile:

This maxim is generally a translation of Murphy’s Law to some extent, and it basically says to “be cautious”. However, PC feminists who follow the Duluth Model of female victim/male perpetrator (and others who believe in maintaining restrictive gender roles) seem to use reverse psychology. In other manner of speaking, if these folks can get chivalrous men to “give an inch” then maybe with a little arm-twisting they can also get the men to “give a mile”. So here again we see how a slight disparity in physique between men and women can be used to justify a whole myriad of unreasonable demands on male beasts of burden. As such, we notice that a SLIGHT disparity in size can lead to a MAJOR disparity in disposability. When all is said and done, it is the so-called “big tough” men who comprise the vast majority of the homeless, suicides, the prison population, victims of prison rape, job fatalities, victims of the “glass cellar”, victims of the female dominated “spending gap”, victims of the scientifically proven “pay gap myth”, false allegations, military draft bias, restrictive “big boys don’t cry” brainwashing, domestic violence bias, sentencing disparity bias, sexist female-only government programs, chivalry bias, unfair custody/divorce laws, the longevity gap, and victims of violence in general. Are women really too weak….or just too special? Are men really strong….or just disposable?

Ladies first (chivalry as female privilege):

There is an old-fashioned saying “when mama is happy we are all happy”. It guess it is up to the worker bees to make life more comfortable for the queen and appease her. Unfortunately, just as every rose has a thorn every cute honey-making bee also has a stinger (bees are not necessarily as sweet as their honey). And that stinger is chivalry….a politically-correct term for anti-male sexism. When men are cornered into making stressful and life-threatening sacrifices for women and children we call it the “gentlemanly” thing to do. Talk about spin-control. We teach men and boys that it is just as rewarding for them to “work” and “give” to women pleasantries that these very same women just as happily “take”. I see the ads depicting a “love-struck” man “happily” spending hard-earned money and buying his true love a “wedding ring”, chocolates, spa packages, or flowers where the woman is just as happy to “accept” them. I wonder how many women have EVER bought a man an expensive ring and treated him like the “prize”….or how many working women feel entitled to the male-dominated professions of the “glass ceiling” as opposed to joining the equally male-dominated blue-collar underclass of the “glass cellar”. After all, the pay-gap is not only a myth, but the female dominated spending gap is very real. I recently went into a hard-ware store that was selling T-shirts saying “The Man’s Shopping Mall” on them. Naturally I compared the type of merchandise in the “man’s shopping mall” (hardware store) with the merchandise in the garden-variety shopping mall. And since the aforementioned T-shirt took the liberty to separate the stores by gender, I will assume for the sake of argument that the garden-variety clothing store is generally female terrain (although technically shopping malls have a myriad of clothing and items for males). The merchandise in the hardware store generally emphasizes boring and possibly dangerous work-related productivity that also benefits “women and children”. For example, they had items like toilets, house paint, bug spray, glue, deck stain, power tools, tool boxes, work clothing, cement mix, WD-40, tires, grass seed, lawn mowers, and auto-motive parts. The regular shopping mall has items that allow women to feel special, pampered, healthy, safe, happy, beautiful, comfortable, relaxed, or to feel like a princess. Common things in these stores are fashionable clothing, nail salons, massage centers, makeup, jewelry counters, candy shops, food courts, chic bath and body solutions, fashionable purses, and hair salons. Obviously, when females do traditional and “domestic” household chores this is not fun and games either. However, if housework is as menial as PC feminists would have us believe, why are so few women willing to marry down or marry a male househusband while she scurries off to the salt-mines? I am reminded of a “battle of the sexes” board-game I saw once showing on the cover a “power drill” on the male side and a “diamond ring” on the female side. How can that box cover even be remotely symbolic of a “gender battle”? How is a power drill (a boring tool for work) even remotely comparable to getting a romantic and frivolous diamond (paid for by men)? It would have been more accurate to call the board game “Unsuccessful Battles of the Male Underclass”. It is funny how many self-professed “progressive” and avant garde intellectual “feminists” want to retain age-old conservative notions of chivalry and female materialism. Are women really too weak….or just too special? Are men really strong….or just disposable?

I am a masculist AND a feminist. I believe that gender roles can restrict us all. I think too many females are objectified as “sex objects” while too many males are objectified as disposable and heroic “success/status” objects. As a feminist, I believe that women are strong, talented, and intellectual. As a masculist, I believe that men are sensitive, vulnerable, capable of weakness, and emotional. As a masculist, I believe that men are too often taught to “play the hero” and take unnecessary risks to “prove” their masculinity. As a feminist, I believe that women are too often taught to “play the victim” and playing the part of a “damsel in distress” with “learned helplessness”. Males and females alike have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. This means equal pain AND equal pampering. So this begs the question: if we as a society like to think of ourselves as “tolerant”, “compassionate,” and “non-sexist”, then how does it get away with treating males so badly? I believe the answer involves cognitive biases like cognitive dissonance (justifying hurtful thoughts, feelings, and behaviors with guilt-alleviating and ego-preserving intellectual justifications like the “just world hypothesis”), blind obedience (like the Milgram Shock Experiment), blind conformity (like the Asch studies on conformity), biased conceptualizations of “privilege”, and self-fulfilling prophecy/role-playing (like the Zimbardo Prison Study). Few of us want to “admit” to being “sexist”, since this is a “negative label”. It is easier to “believe” you are non-sexist when you can at the same time justify resentment and envy with excuses like the “Duluth Model” or the male perp/female victim dichotomy. And it is not just PC feminists. I believe that in general male death, pain, and disposability has always been secondary to the protection of “women and children”. I will close with a statement that too many men throughout history have always wanted to say: Why do I always have to be the strong one?

Originally published November 5, 2009 at http://www.ifeminists.net/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.598

Bookmark and Share

Letter to the Office of Violence Against Women

November 3rd, 2009
By Harry Crouch
Article Source
Posted in Domestic abuse/violence, Harry Crouch

Attached is a letter from the National Coalition For Men to the Office of Violence Against Women regarding the recent West Virginia court case in which the state’s domestic violence organization, the Family Violence Prevention Services Board’s,  policies, procedures, and practices were voided because they were blatantly unconstitutional and discriminated against men. A number of allied organizations joined NCFM by endorsing the letter.

Harry Crouch

President, NCFM

Bookmark and Share




Site Meter